Suddenly after the unfortunate incident of sacking Steve Bucknor – who in my opinion has been made an escape goat to defuse the tension – the captioned subject is the latest and the hottest subject that is being discussed in the cricket circles and a question is being raised, whether we should keep the neutral umpires or we go for the best umpires to officiate the international matches?
Former players like Steve Waugh, Ramiz Raja, Wasim Bari etc., have raised a voice to get the best umpires. From this notion it gives one the impression that so far the neutral umpires were not the best, therefore, there is a need to get the best ones!
This is once again a farcical move by the gurus who keep on talking about something different only to remain in focus of the media. The need for neutral umpires was felt in the past when the home umpires were not only making errors in judgment, but they were emotionally behind their own home team. Pakistan, especially Imran Khan felt the need for neutral umpires and asked the authorities to implement this as a rule. In fact, the first neutral umpires officiated an international match was in Pakistan. Since then it became a practice and hence the rule.
Prior to that, usual concerns and voices were raised against this move that, it is ridiculous and there is no need to have neutral umpires because, an umpire is supposed to be neutral, and he is neutral. Therefore, the authorities would be doubting at the integrity of the umpires if they implement this neutral umpire rule.
Click to continue reading “Neutral Umpires Vs. Best Umpires”



Recent Comments